From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lennart Borgman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mailclient-send-it usage of browse-url Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:15:36 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86DDDA9D-2655-4B6C-A54E-AA87521C74E9@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1271351780 19569 80.91.229.12 (15 Apr 2010 17:16:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 17:16:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, "christian.lynbech@tieto.com>" To: chad Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 15 19:16:18 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Sfp-0002EU-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:16:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Sfl-0000o7-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:16:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Sff-0000kg-U3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34547 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Sfa-0000cv-RG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:16:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2SfV-0002xq-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.154]:23753) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2SfV-0002xb-Aa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so791980fga.12 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:received:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h7lKdXDugTNAWctFfKrwU36ZzoLtuippq1ijgcrdFA8=; b=OeNOgPXpY7hXsJD1F+LtnUN4KSiouN/lNksvRb/gWdKU7wy0uqGzDWitNEdYXQLNKh /4ii2pnXzECASynWJBTrtflAbc0proijgQOghao9MWKFt9bM5ziNr+PnvxIzDbRhxhT2 Wg0mCqFGv7iIDbS/9byqK6qeTLO6oFfeJ+7/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=td7bZQ4mBClejIJrmBONrSnl3I+gAkuG+mqwaMkG/ukzxvt1u7FNu4gHyqBa4shtl9 CmWyWiQp+AUhgpoFby0/5ThUPUvhe/rbqHTNNY38ZCmQhNE1o/Y2vsC3N+j8fjzL+3jn TfhGANWtxCYv5jIOTZT4vPo/4z6FojXpj7L/w= Original-Received: by 10.239.169.18 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:15:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86DDDA9D-2655-4B6C-A54E-AA87521C74E9@gmail.com> Original-Received: by 10.239.188.135 with SMTP id p7mr41617hbh.90.1271351756199; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:15:56 -0700 (PDT) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:123715 Archived-At: On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 6:49 PM, chad wrote: > > Until someone writes M-x telepathically-fix-smtp-auth-settings, sendmail = cannot > easily be configured by end users. =C2=A0Until sendmail can easily be con= figured by > end users, using `open' is a far, far better choice. Better, but not good enough IMO since it does not work for web mail and a lot of users might have that. (Perhaps especially those that are making free software at home. I consider those as an important target.) As I have already said (without any response) for those users browse-url with an intermediate html file (see my prev) reply might be a better solution. And it probably works for mostly all who have a web browser.