From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Correct byte compiler error/warning positions. The solution! Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2021 17:53:03 +0000 Message-ID: References: <8335nh29pt.fsf@gnu.org> <83wnktzxb2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilwcyc6o.fsf@gnu.org> <8335nfw2pe.fsf@gnu.org> <838rx4s224.fsf@gnu.org> <834k7ss172.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="1288"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 01 18:54:33 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msToP-00006s-Rc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 18:54:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52972 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msToO-000847-Km for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTnG-0006FV-Il for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:53:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:63922) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msTnC-0002X7-KY; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 12:53:22 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 1B1Hr3kf013045 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 1 Dec 2021 17:53:04 GMT In-Reply-To: <834k7ss172.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 01 Dec 2021 19:08:01 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280663 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: [...] > If all the benchmarks show a slowdown <= 1%, I'm okay with merging it. > > Thanks. Another quick note, I think we should evaluate the impact not only with different benchmarks but also using a native compiled build (ATM the branch has no support for that). Thanks Andrea