From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Getting ready to land native-compilation on master Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:48:28 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83v98v7dzs.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2dl9p2k.fsf@posteo.net> <878s5l9msq.fsf@posteo.net> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4105"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 14 12:49:38 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lWd5V-0000yJ-SG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:49:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33532 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWd5U-00075r-TU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWd4e-0006Ei-MO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:63890) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lWd4S-0007pR-K8; Wed, 14 Apr 2021 06:48:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 13EAmSNa028182 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:48:29 GMT In-Reply-To: <878s5l9msq.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Wed, 14 Apr 2021 12:35:01 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268037 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >> Philip Kaludercic writes: >> >>> Eli Zaretskii writes: >>> >>>> If no significant issues pop up within a week, I will ask Andrea to >>>> merge the branch onto master the next weekend (i.e. around 17th of >>>> April). >>> >>> I have been trying out the branch for the last few days and I didn't >>> notice any functional issues. >>> >>> What was is annoying is the "sudden" warning buffers pop up, triggered >>> by from what I understand is the asynchronous (?) compilation. Is there >>> a way to mitigate this, and if so, it should be documented. >> >> I Philip, >> >> one can act on the `comp-async-report-warnings-errors' customize setting >> it to nil (default is t). > > That should do it, thank you. > > Does it make sense to have this enabled by default? At the very least, > ELPA packages should be addressed that trigger needless issues such as > overlong lines. I think this was discussed a while ago here around and the consensus was "for now" to keep it t as default so developers can come to know and address issues, for the future I guess likely is going changed. Andrea