From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Time to merge scratch/correct-warning-pos into master, perhaps? Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:04:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <837darmygd.fsf@gnu.org> <58bb8030d59733b52b8d@heytings.org> <83r18zkmd5.fsf@gnu.org> <835yq9ls7j.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11240176288f@heytings.org> <83h79tjd2f.fsf@gnu.org> <058b682b11f58780b580@heytings.org> <83v8y8ij39.fsf@gnu.org> <6a5bb5a08b3d764611f9@heytings.org> <6a5bb5a08b93601c5708@heytings.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38845"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: mattiase@acm.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, Alan Mackenzie , Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org To: Gregory Heytings Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 22:07:31 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nCpVr-0009tf-Hu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 22:07:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48434 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCpVq-0001lU-19 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:07:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40128) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCpSp-0007ub-IT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:04:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:64963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nCpSn-0004mk-JE; Wed, 26 Jan 2022 16:04:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 20QL44qc023696 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 26 Jan 2022 21:04:05 GMT In-Reply-To: (Gregory Heytings's message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2022 18:43:57 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:285460 Archived-At: Gregory Heytings writes: >> >> if your system is noisy >> > > It's on an unloaded build machine, with just one sshd and one bash > process. > >> >> you can increase `elb-runs' to an higher value, in the results an >> estimation of the error anyway is given (probably more reliable with >> ~ elb-runs >= 5?). >> > > Thanks, I'll keep that in mind! > >> >> That said yes, is a suite of micro benchmarks but it's better than >> nothing. >> > > Of course; my remark was certainly not meant to be derogatory. No worries, it was not how I got it :) Last words just to repeat that if there's a slowdown in such a defined area of code, a micro benchmark is the right tool to prove and investigate that. We must be able to clearly exercise this supposed slowdown if exists. Thanks Andrea