From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term) Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 12:55:40 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <834jwnbi6c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtafnun5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org> <8735c6b0wo.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1ty9lha.fsf@gnus.org> <87lepym6ok.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877d1i9h7k.fsf@gnus.org> <83edvqyr3q.fsf@gnu.org> <874jwl8e4p.fsf@gnus.org> <87ill16t3a.fsf@gnus.org> <87edvp6nnf.fsf@gnus.org> <87a66d6lsw.fsf@gnus.org> <875yh16k59.fsf@gnus.org> <871qrp6itb.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , rlb@defaultvalue.org, david@tethera.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 14:58:57 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1og3zF-0005x9-8N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 14:58:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42480 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og3zE-0000Re-Aa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 08:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36666) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og3w8-0007LQ-LM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 08:55:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:56606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1og3w7-0004bS-74; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 08:55:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 295Cte0b011402 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 5 Oct 2022 12:55:41 GMT In-Reply-To: <871qrp6itb.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 03 Oct 2022 17:14:08 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:296957 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> We can expand the variable name, but I couldn't think of a good name. >>> And "deferred" doesn't convey anything. >> >> Lazy? Auto(matic)? Ondemand? > > `inhibit-lazy-native-compilation' sounds like it makes the compilation > less lazy. `inhibit-automatic-native-compilation' might work. Again `inhibit-automatic-native-compilation' does not disable automatic trampoline native compilation :/ BTW I think most of people refers to what was controlled by `native-comp-deferred-compilation' as a jitter mechanism, so I think a better name would have been `inhibit-native-jit-compilation'. I wish this change was not rushed. Best Regards Andrea