From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On elisp running native Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:21:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83tv5mp48l.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgl0lchm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="243483"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 31 17:22:36 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1imKI0-0011BV-Cl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 17:22:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44206 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imKHz-0007yZ-9b for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:22:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49423) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imKHU-0007R4-Ue for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:22:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imKHT-00014f-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:22:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.20]:63752) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imKHS-0000hz-4v; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 11:22:02 -0500 Original-Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id xBVGLxAD011410 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:21:59 GMT Original-Received: (from akrl@localhost) by sdf.org (8.15.2/8.12.8/Submit) id xBVGLwNm016661; Tue, 31 Dec 2019 16:21:58 GMT In-Reply-To: <83sgl0lchm.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 Dec 2019 17:51:33 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 205.166.94.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:243813 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 10:24:37 +0000 >> >> For the branch name would 'gccemacs' be fine? > > The "emacs" part is redundant, so I'd suggest "libgccjit" instead. The libgccjit interface and dependency is just a part of the realized infrastructure (also in discussion). I'd like to call it something like "native-comp" or "native-lisp". I believe is more descriptive of what I've done and of its scope. Thinking about is not even a jit compiler... > >> Should I squash all my history or keep it as it is? The branch went >> through quite some experimentations. I'm not sure about its history >> value. > > It's completely up to you, since it's your history. If is possible to postpone the history rework to before the eventual merge I guess I'll prefer to do so. It's a bit messy but if it does not bother others it does not bother me. Two branch related questions: - Is force push allowed in these feature branches? - Should it go in / /feature or /scratch ? Thanks Andrea -- akrl@sdf.org