From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some native compiler related renaming Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 16:33:14 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83bl9l9wuz.fsf@gnu.org> <835yzp5udi.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28686"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 11 18:34:49 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVLN-0007Mk-5f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 18:34:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44722 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVLM-00053g-54 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47586) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVJw-0003XW-OO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:54739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lgVJs-0003An-Pi; Tue, 11 May 2021 12:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 14BGXE6C028740 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 11 May 2021 16:33:15 GMT In-Reply-To: <835yzp5udi.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 11 May 2021 15:26:33 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269167 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 08:40:25 +0000 >> >> Hi Eli & all, >> >> question: should we rename also `comp-deferred-compilation'? (and >> possibly `comp-deferred-compilation-deny-list' too)? > > If we expect downstream distros to stick to the "no *.el files" > policy, then yeah, I guess so. (I didn't include it in the list I > posted a week ago because I thought no one in their right mind would > want to disable native-compilation, except for debugging special > situations.) Not sure what downstream distros will stick to so I did the renaming. Also the deny list is something that might be useful to some user, and ATM we have all defcustoms in comp.el with the native- prefix (with the exception of comp-libgccjit-reproducer that is really a debug thing). Thanks Andrea