From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Profiling native-compilation Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:57:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83mttpo4rv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3030"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 23 10:58:36 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lZrdz-0000S0-Ig for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 10:58:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38430 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZrdy-0003N3-Kj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 04:58:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33828) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZrdR-0002we-UM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 04:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:64509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lZrdQ-0006Vj-8B; Fri, 23 Apr 2021 04:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 13N8vtCm012158 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:57:56 GMT In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo via's message of "Fri, 23 Apr 2021 08:45:44 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268308 Archived-At: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." writes: [...] > I think would be interesting to sort by priority what I think are the > three main ares to work on the native compiler on the post merge phase: ^^^ four > compile-time, generated code performance, hardening, documentation. BTW to get an idea, I know is not defined but very roughly how much time do we have before the 28 release branch is cut? To get a feeling of how much and what we can hope to fit into. Thanks Andrea