From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Q: What is default architecture for code produced by native compiler? Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:19:56 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83k0k9vigu.fsf@gnu.org> <83czq1vfc8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 25 15:26:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mIsvL-0005ST-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 15:26:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46974 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIsvK-0003LD-MX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:26:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53590) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIsp0-00025B-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:52337) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mIsoy-0008QK-Er; Wed, 25 Aug 2021 09:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 17PDJu9v016790 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:19:56 GMT In-Reply-To: <83czq1vfc8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:11:51 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:272976 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrea Corallo >> Cc: arthur.miller@live.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 13:04:25 +0000 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> >> Driver options are not for the compiler but rather linker and assembler, >> >> infact `native-comp-driver-options' relies on >> >> 'gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option' [1]. >> > >> > Then the name of the defcustom is misleading, IMO. >> >> You are probably right, the defcustom name is inherited from the >> libgccjit entry point name but it is probably not optimal. Any >> suggestion for a better one? > > Something like native-comp-backend-driver-options, together with > explaining in the doc string that typically only assembler and linker > options are meaningful. Ack >> So yes, exposing 'gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option' we could. > > We probably should, yes. Deal, will do. Thanks Andrea