From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: --with-native-compilation build failure on 32-bit systems Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 21:01:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <86k07nl9qe.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <87bksyc36k.fsf@gnus.org> <83h72lvf8g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34894"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, jrm@ftfl.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org, emacs@FreeBSD.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 23:03:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oOQCQ-0008t4-MH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 23:03:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35228 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOQCP-0001Tm-D3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:03:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36566) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOQAl-0008P5-Fh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:61309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oOQAj-0003OK-II; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 17:01:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 27HL1mkj022295 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 17 Aug 2022 21:01:48 GMT In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2022 19:59:59 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:293574 Archived-At: Andrea Corallo writes: [...] > Okay, I had some time to work on this and this is what's going: > > After having loaded ediff-hooks temacs never sweeps vectors because, > even if call `garbage-collect' before dumping, this is inhibited cause > we overflowed purespace. > > Interestingly we warn for purespace overflow calling 'check_pure_size' > when dumping with unexec and not with pdumper. Given this makes the GC > not functional (at least in this phase) I'm wondering if we shouldn't do > this as well. > > Also, thinking about the whole system even better, I think fixing-up CUs > reachable from named functions is definitely a bad for another reason > that is lambdas! We could have a lambda referenced somewhere that keeps > a CU loaded and we need to fix it up anyway before dumping. > > So yeah I guess tomorrow I'll prepare the patch were we keep a list of > loaded CU to fix-up. Right I pushed the fix to scratch/better-cu-fixup so far as: - I don't know if we want 1a637303b4 and 4bdda39f71 in master or 28. - I suspect there's some good reason I'm not aware of why we don't eb539e92e9 at all (this is not necessary to fix the reported issue tho). Bests! Andrea