From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: News from the lexical world Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:34:37 +0000 Message-ID: References: <834kgc4ykj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36208"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , raman@google.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 12 10:36:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lVs3i-0009KD-Qq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 10:36:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42486 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVs3h-0006vB-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:36:37 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34610) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVs1v-0005r6-8C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:34:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:62210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lVs1s-00064P-UG; Mon, 12 Apr 2021 04:34:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 13C8YbTs015474 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 12 Apr 2021 08:34:38 GMT In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sun, 11 Apr 2021 12:34:02 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:267945 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >>> > Between native compilation and lexical scoping updates, emacs 28 is >>> > looking to be a truly momentous released! >>> Although the fact that bundled ELisp files use lexical-binding should >>> have no visible impact on Emacs users >> Nor native compilation, for that matter: it doesn't add functionality, >> "only" speeds Emacs up. > > Indeed (tho it should be somewhat visible because of the extra files > and the occasional difference in performance: use of lexical-binding > can't even claim such minor impacts). But we can say that the native compiler works better on lexical code as on dynamic one just gives-up on any Lisp optimization :) Andrea