From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: native-comp-async-report-warnings-errors default value Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 17:14:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87h7dj7su7.fsf@gmail.com> <83r1cnlu6y.fsf@gnu.org> <87czo77rx7.fsf@gmail.com> <87fsrbyltb.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="5833"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Robert Pluim , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 02 18:21:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1msplf-0001Jm-NO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:21:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59514 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1msple-00028p-Q3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:21:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:37256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mspfM-0003lY-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:58804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mspfK-0002yA-Ou; Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:14:40 -0500 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 1B2HEXag010243 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:14:34 GMT In-Reply-To: <87fsrbyltb.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 02 Dec 2021 18:10:40 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:280769 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Stefan Kangas writes: > >> Robert Pluim writes: >> >>> Eli> No, not yet: too many problems that trigger those warnings nee= d to be >>> Eli> fixed rather than swept under the carpet of silence. But you = can do >>> Eli> it in your customizations if you don't want to be bothered. >>> >>> As long as we do it just before we release emacs-28, I guess that=CA=BCs >>> OK. >> >> Is it time to make this change on emacs-28 now? Do we have any real >> problems left to fix in Emacs itself? >> >> If it is important to keep, how about a default like >> >> (=3D emacs-minor-version 0) >> >> so that users at least don't have to see this in the released version? > > I think it would make sense to disable this in the pretests, too, since > we'll be seeing lots of people trying those out, and they'll be getting > all these warnings (that won't be doing them any good). +1