From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Eager garbage collection Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:26:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20201118002050.16426-1-sbaugh@catern.com> <835z62r9fb.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2iypopu.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29015"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: sbaugh@catern.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 18 18:44:41 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRVY-0007RS-CJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 18:44:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60950 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRVX-0007s6-Di for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:44:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41338) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRDx-0004lu-HE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:26:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:52967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kfRDt-0003EI-Vj; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 12:26:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mab (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTP id 0AIHQLgO020107; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 17:26:21 GMT In-Reply-To: <83y2iypopu.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2020 19:19:25 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/18 10:30:26 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = ??? X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:259366 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The devil, as usually, is in the details. What is radically different > between the two is the value of X1. In the gcmh.el case, the value of > X1 is alarmingly large, something I keep warning people against for a > long time. I don't want us to adopt such dangerous practices. And > using that large value is central to the idea of gcmh.el, so if we > lower it significantly, I wouldn't expect it to provide significant > benefits. I see, I was discussing the implementations rather than the defaults. Indeed these are easy to change to what we think is suitable for going into master. Andrea