From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The Emacs master is much slower than the emacs-27 branch. Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:29:25 +0000 Message-ID: References: <83wnxxcmjr.fsf@gnu.org> <83tut0d7e9.fsf@gnu.org> <83h7p0d37y.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft4kd2ym.fsf@gnu.org> <83eek4d2co.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnxwuzt0.fsf@tcd.ie> <83360kconl.fsf@gnu.org> <20201205145622.e4clewt4iq27q7g6@Ergus> <83y2icb7zz.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Andrea Corallo Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15346"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Ergus , contovob@tcd.ie, ghe@sdf.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, acm@muc.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 05 16:30:55 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klZWQ-0003u4-KX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:30:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klZWP-0001YS-Mb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:30:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klZV8-0000fK-86 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:29:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mab.sdf.org ([205.166.94.33]:45316 helo=ma.sdf.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klZV6-0001Lo-MT; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 10:29:34 -0500 Original-Received: from akrl by ma.sdf.org with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klZUz-00076X-Lg; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 15:29:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83y2icb7zz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:14:08 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.33; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=ma.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260371 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Personally, I don't think we should even try to come up with single > benchmark. We should instead have several, and make sure we > understand and/or fix slowdown in any one of them. Volunteers are > welcome to work on a suite of such benchmarks, we could then put them > under test/ somewhere. We already have something like: It would be nice to extend it and maybe have it in core. Andrea