From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Corallo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term) Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2022 01:19:24 +0000 Message-ID: References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <871qrrpkgx.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <834jwnbi6c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtafnun5.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org> <8735c6b0wo.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1ty9lha.fsf@gnus.org> <87lepym6ok.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877d1i9h7k.fsf@gnus.org> <83edvqyr3q.fsf@gnu.org> <874jwl8e4p.fsf@gnus.org> <871qrm2eiu.fsf@gnus.org> <87k05d25rv.fsf@gnus.org> <87bkqp23be.fsf@gnus.org> <87y1ttzrmp.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35790"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , rlb@defaultvalue.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, david@tethera.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 06 03:20:38 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ogFYz-000948-Fl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 03:20:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46658 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogFYi-0005zx-PS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 21:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogFXw-0004fX-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 21:19:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:54400) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ogFXv-00057e-Ah; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 21:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33]) by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 2961JOXA014144 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 6 Oct 2022 01:19:25 GMT In-Reply-To: <87y1ttzrmp.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 06 Oct 2022 03:07:42 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org; helo=mx.sdf.org X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297044 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Andrea Corallo writes: > >>>>>>>> Also repeatable testing are most likely executed in batch mode and... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ...surprise surprise deferred compilation is *already* *disabled* in >>>>>>>> this mode!! > > [...] > >> Where? > > There. Oh my! FYI this is what we wrote: > >> . understand why and in which situations they may need it > > > > Doing repeatable testing is one obvious situation. > > I think the two previously mentioned knobs should be sufficient for > repeatable testing no? As you can see I said that the *two* mentioned knobs should be sufficient for test repeatability, not that "--batch is the panacea for repeatable testing". > But if you were just doing another non-sequitur -- that you didn't mean > that "deferred compilation" and --batch is related to repeatable > testing, that's fine. You were just making conversation and not > claiming anything? Sorry are you serious?