From: Andrea Corallo via "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>, Tomas Hlavaty <tom@logand.com>,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: named-let
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:50:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xjf1reqdm64.fsf@sdf.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvk0si2fyj.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2021 13:07:24 -0500")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> As a side note I think we could have full TCO in Emacs, but at the cost
>> of a relatively invasive patch and a some (probably small but hard
>> to quantify a priori) performance regression. Not sure it is
>> sufficiently important to justify that.
>
> That's the question, indeed.
> Also, I have the impression that "full TCO" could be difficult if we
> consider the mixed case where a compiled function calls an interpreted
> function and vice-versa.
I might be wrong but I think should be possible to harmonize both sides
with not much problems (other than the mentioned enormous codebase
diff).
But anyway, I've no time to prove I'm right or wrong on this :/
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 18:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-09 1:43 named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-09 8:58 ` named-let tomas
2021-01-09 16:01 ` named-let Joost Kremers
2021-01-09 21:48 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-09 15:23 ` named-let Tomas Hlavaty
2021-01-09 16:44 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-09 17:03 ` named-let Helmut Eller
2021-01-09 18:43 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-09 18:47 ` named-let Tomas Hlavaty
2021-01-10 18:49 ` named-let Zhu Zihao
2021-01-11 22:27 ` named-let Tomas Hlavaty
2021-01-11 22:36 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-11 22:48 ` named-let Tomas Hlavaty
2021-01-11 22:50 ` named-let Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions.
2021-01-11 23:10 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-11 23:28 ` named-let Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions.
2021-01-11 23:57 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-12 9:24 ` named-let Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions.
2021-01-12 18:07 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-12 18:50 ` Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions. [this message]
2021-01-12 9:13 ` named-let Helmut Eller
2021-01-13 8:11 ` named-let Zhu Zihao
2021-01-13 14:01 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
2021-01-11 22:40 ` named-let Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions.
2021-01-11 22:51 ` named-let Tomas Hlavaty
2021-01-11 23:04 ` named-let Andrea Corallo via Emacs development discussions.
2021-01-12 0:12 ` named-let Tomas Hlavaty
2021-01-20 19:44 ` named-let Stefan Monnier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=xjf1reqdm64.fsf@sdf.org \
--to=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=akrl@sdf.org \
--cc=all_but_last@163.com \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=tom@logand.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).