From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Giorgos Keramidas Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: "no process" gnus bug when moving messages from nnml to imap folder Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:32:39 -0800 Message-ID: References: <8762t1dww9.fsf@gnus.org> <871v3orhhw.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296769372 32330 80.91.229.12 (3 Feb 2011 21:42:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 21:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 03 22:42:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl6wo-0002hI-5s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:42:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl6hl-00010A-CZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:27:05 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55991 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pl5rC-0001Gh-II for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl5r8-0006ut-Pt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:32:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-gy0-f169.google.com ([209.85.160.169]:33427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pl5r8-0006un-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: by gyd10 with SMTP id 10so762056gyd.0 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:32:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=swKQKy/uWcwCwqaOcCN98xBMA82P9tywJvlEfRcvAiw=; b=H7LvybT2iKBmnTrwbeoQXNT+m66SDQ+7yN+qpBtLl41TFPQ2iU+C3v/bwbo87ra2ja jU6D64CMbAglNpA6NL4bBqg3I0eqUBNvYmXvrYrTWT7mcoQGWIAxgJYDBIEkyybBKvLZ 30pa/IkET89gnTFLdGjXYGta5iNC8II7zhNzU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=WdkIk15bdAwrhUIF/KSyqSMjguwVzn2BF7Jx/3WYkoVTrlLmLH5ok7y9YzUX4ub1F+ v9sWTaZhqfdln7iNMgDjl+OTamV68iB7AFKu9b7rGhZoPgX/m0/eAcKFdRtZy+NMGyAj kd+Yu5X4OCUsyXeqiPn1O02eIe1QX3fLMq9I4= Original-Received: by 10.150.53.16 with SMTP id b16mr13212510yba.172.1296765161989; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:32:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.gmail.com (dhcp-172-19-7-72.mtv.corp.google.com [172.19.7.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i59sm730676yhd.3.2011.02.03.12.32.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:32:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871v3orhhw.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:27:23 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.160.169 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:22:30 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135527 Archived-At: On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 12:27:23 -0800, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas writes: > >> It's more weird that just the message-id. The article has a partially >> corrupt body; it's what I managed to salvage off an old email archive. >> The text of the article itself has only _one_ message-id header though. >> >> I've attached it in gzip compressed format. > > It arrived without an attachment. > >> The same problem (no process for buffer *nnimap ... <4>*) happens for >> other messages too, however. It doesn't seem related to the message-id >> of the article, but to the way we create nnimap connection buffers. > > Do you have a backtrace for one of the normal articles? I'm not sure I understand the question, but I'll try to reply. I don't get a backtrace when I move articles from a local nnml group to another, also local, nnml group. I only get a backtrace when I try to move messages from a local nnml group to an nnimap destination group.