unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Should pgg be mark obsolete?
@ 2008-11-25 12:01 Leo
  2008-12-09 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2008-11-25 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-devel

Hi there,

With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete?

Bye,
-- 
.:  Leo  :.  [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ]  .:  [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ]  :.

        Use the better alternative -- http://www.openoffice.org/





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete?
  2008-11-25 12:01 Should pgg be mark obsolete? Leo
@ 2008-12-09 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
  2008-12-20 17:41   ` Leo
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2008-12-09 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leo; +Cc: emacs-devel

> With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete?

I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of
PGG author(s) and users.  Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete?


        Stefan




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete?
  2008-12-09 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2008-12-20 17:41   ` Leo
  2008-12-22  2:49     ` Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2008-12-20 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: emacs-devel

On 2008-12-09 21:00 +0000, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete?
>
> I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of
> PGG author(s) and users.  Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete?

There seems to be no objections. Shall we go ahead marking it obsolete?

>
>
>         Stefan

-- 
.:  Leo  :.  [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ]  .: I use Emacs :.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete?
  2008-12-20 17:41   ` Leo
@ 2008-12-22  2:49     ` Stefan Monnier
  2008-12-22 18:22       ` ken manheimer
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2008-12-22  2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leo; +Cc: Ken Manheimer, emacs-devel

>>> With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete?
>> I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of
>> PGG author(s) and users.  Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete?
> There seems to be no objections. Shall we go ahead marking it obsolete?

Apparently, PGG is still used by allout.el, so we should try and get Ken
to update his code to use EPG instead before we mark PGG obsolete.
But please add a node about this to pgg.el (something like "On its way
to obsolescence, waiting for allout.el to switch to EPG.").


        Stefan




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Should pgg be mark obsolete?
  2008-12-22  2:49     ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2008-12-22 18:22       ` ken manheimer
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ken manheimer @ 2008-12-22 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Leo, emacs-devel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1140 bytes --]

first, thanks for looking out for allout.  i need to investigate the switch
to epg, hope i'll have the time soon.  time is a challenge, plus i do some
tricky things with the pgg password cache that i would need to duplicate in
the transition, and am nervous that will increase the challenge
significantly.  i'm not sure anyone can advise me without investigating the
allout code more than they would wish, but if so let me know.
-- 
ken
http://myriadicity.net


On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>wrote:

> >>> With EPG to supersede PGG, should PGG be marked obsolete?
> >> I would tend to think so, yes, but I'd first like to have the opinion of
> >> PGG author(s) and users.  Anybody objects to marking PGG as obsolete?
> > There seems to be no objections. Shall we go ahead marking it obsolete?
>
> Apparently, PGG is still used by allout.el, so we should try and get Ken
> to update his code to use EPG instead before we mark PGG obsolete.
> But please add a node about this to pgg.el (something like "On its way
> to obsolescence, waiting for allout.el to switch to EPG.").
>
>
>        Stefan
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1621 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-22 18:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-25 12:01 Should pgg be mark obsolete? Leo
2008-12-09 21:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-12-20 17:41   ` Leo
2008-12-22  2:49     ` Stefan Monnier
2008-12-22 18:22       ` ken manheimer

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).