From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: delete-file to trash Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 11:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: References: <877hmvxyuv.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274609738 2529 80.91.229.12 (23 May 2010 10:15:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 23 May 2010 10:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lennart Borgman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 23 12:15:37 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG8DX-0000me-1B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 12:15:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41628 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OG8DW-0002u2-9U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:15:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33087 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OG8DN-0002t7-DN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:15:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG8DL-0000Fe-IG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:15:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.131]:42440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OG8DL-0000FU-9i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 May 2010 06:15:23 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]:56170) by ppsw-31.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.157]:587) with esmtpsa (LOGIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1OG8DK-0006tv-BQ (Exim 4.70) (return-path ); Sun, 23 May 2010 11:15:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Lennart Borgman's message of "Sun, 23 May 2010 12:00:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125102 Archived-At: On 2010-05-23 11:00 +0100, Lennart Borgman wrote: > On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Leo wrote: >> >> of them. For example, I quite like to use visual-line-mode for editing >> TeX, but the fact that the line goes to window edge makes it almost >> unusable in this scenario since I tend to maximise emacs frames. > > > I also like `visual-line-mode=B4 and most of the time has Emacs > maximized so I wrote `wrap-to-fill-column-mode' for this (part of > nXhtml). With it you are editing in a middle column (like in Dark Room > etc). Does your code re-use word-wrap code? Leo