From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-w3m? Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:10:11 +0000 Organization: University of Cambridge Message-ID: References: <3E1D063D-AC8A-4E40-B9F8-6ACA5089C4A7@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267114236 9022 80.91.229.12 (25 Feb 2010 16:10:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 25 17:10:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgIJ-0002ht-Bc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:10:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34468 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkgII-0002D8-M6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:10:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NkgID-0002BP-RV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41763 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NkgID-0002Am-47 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgIC-0001Uk-Ly for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:10:25 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40467) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgIC-0001Ug-EG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:10:24 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NkgIA-0002c8-Nq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:10:22 +0100 Original-Received: from smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.95.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:10:22 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:10:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: smaug.linux.pwf.cam.ac.uk User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XINCxgD3658GznFDj1jyb+irsqA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121361 Archived-At: On 2010-02-25 15:26 +0000, David Reitter wrote: > The big question is whether this memory leak is acceptable. We have 30 > MB extra in this case. Even if this is less when compressed, we're > talking a lot of total storage given some 500 copies of the repository > (??) and infinitely more bandwidth incurred in the future when > checking out the repo. (Infinite because Emacs will never die.) And if this mistake can happen so easily it will happen again. Leo