From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.multi-tty Subject: Re: Emacs routinely gets stuck in single_kboard mode Date: 14 Jul 2004 01:49:26 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089762617 14233 80.91.224.253 (13 Jul 2004 23:50:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:50:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: multi-tty@lists.fnord.hu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 14 01:49:59 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BkX27-0005cK-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 01:49:59 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BkX27-0006ht-00 for ; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 01:49:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkX4V-00050a-P3 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:52:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkX4O-00050V-93 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:52:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BkX4N-00050J-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:52:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BkX4N-00050G-QP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:52:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BkX1k-0004AT-IV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BkX1c-0003tS-CL; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 19:49:28 -0400 Original-To: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?b?TMWRcmVudGV5IEvDoXJvbHk=?=) In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25661 gmane.emacs.multi-tty:28 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25661 lorentey@elte.hu (L=C5=91rentey K=C3=A1roly) writes: > Anyway, I found that while the Emacs server is running (which is > likely to be the case when there are multiple displays), the > following trick may be used to remotely bail out of a forgotten > recursive edit: >=20 > emacsclient -e '(top-level)' >=20 > (Emacsclient needs to be killed with C-c after this.) You could call emacsclient with the --no-wait option. > (Incidentally, this calls top-level from a process filter. Is that > supported?) No idea, but it gives me the creeps. --=20 David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum