unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: M-<function-key> vs. ESC <function-key>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 20:20:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5r7ky5pqi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvis6a4drq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 06 Jan 2005 13:30:50 -0500")

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>>>>> Yes, I do, because that's what Emacs is receiving when I press
>>>>> Meta-left, for example.  More specifically, when I type
>>>>> Meta-left at Emacs running in xterm it receives the key sequence
>>>>> [?\e ?\e ?O ?D], which gets translated to [?\e left] through
>>>>> function-key-map.
>>>>> 
>>>>> That is a surprise to me.  Someone must have changed this in recent
>>>>> years.
>>> 
>>>> He did not say what his input terminal is.  It may not be X.
>>> 
>>> He said it's an xterm.
>
>> Which is not X.  So Emacs never gets to see Meta.
>
> Please re-read: he presses M-left, which xterm turns into [?\e ?\e
> ?O ?D] and which function-key-map transforms to [?\e left] and the
> lookup with [?\e left] fails to find the M-left binding to
> backward-word.
>
> In contrast, M-C-f is turned by xterm into [?\e ?\C-f] which
> function-key-map leaves alone and the lookup for [?\e ?\C-f]
> successfully finds the M-C-f binding to forward-sexp.

I should work on my attention span.  I even quoted the relevant
passage.  And contributed complete nonsense.  As a kind of excuse, I
have had net access only in the mniddle of the night in the last few
days, and my niece (where I have been visiting) tended to wake me up
at 8am, so the time for sleeping has been in short supply.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

      reply	other threads:[~2005-01-06 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-03 15:16 M-<function-key> vs. ESC <function-key> Andreas Schwab
2005-01-04  3:36 ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-04 12:01   ` Lennart Borgman
2005-01-05  3:31     ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-04 13:02   ` Andreas Schwab
2005-01-05  3:31     ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-05 19:43       ` Andreas Schwab
2005-01-06  4:54         ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-06 12:16           ` Andreas Schwab
2005-01-07  2:49             ` Richard Stallman
2005-01-07  6:36               ` Miles Bader
2005-01-07 13:14               ` Andreas Schwab
2005-01-06 16:14           ` David Kastrup
2005-01-06 17:36             ` Stefan Monnier
2005-01-06 18:03               ` David Kastrup
2005-01-06 18:30                 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-01-06 19:20                   ` David Kastrup [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x5r7ky5pqi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
    --to=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).