From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: schwab@suse.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [harder@ifa.au.dk: Speed of all-completions]
Date: 15 Jun 2004 17:55:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5pt80g6ik.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406151542.i5FFgaG25896@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu> writes:
> If we decide to bind around the entire while loop we should document
> the fact that the binding is in effect during the call to predicate in
> the Elisp manual. In that case, the
> `if (CONSP (Vcompletion_regexp_list))' should be removed, and for
> consistency, the scope should also be extended in Ftest_completion.
>
> Is one single prolonged binding using specbind expensive or was the
> efficiency problem completely caused by the fact that it was used
> countless times in a loop?
The single prolonged binding is expensive, as in most cases the loop
is not entered even once.
At least that's what I understood.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-15 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-13 21:48 [harder@ifa.au.dk: Speed of all-completions] Richard Stallman
2004-06-13 22:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-14 23:27 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 0:04 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-06-15 7:29 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 11:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-15 11:28 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 12:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-15 13:27 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 13:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-15 13:48 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 14:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-15 14:19 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 14:32 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-06-15 15:42 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-06-15 15:55 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2004-06-18 18:45 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-06-19 3:19 ` Richard Stallman
2004-06-20 22:35 ` David Kastrup
2004-06-15 18:13 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x5pt80g6ik.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).