unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Options menu
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:55:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5oedfaavy.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c52c99$Blat.v2.4$0c75eac0@zahav.net.il> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:32:47 +0200")

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Cc: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>,
>> 	  emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:24:34 +0100
>> 
>> > When Emacs 21.1 was released, many users complained about the
>> > changed menu-bar structure, even though the new structure was
>> > generally better, certainly more standard-compliant, and had many
>> > useful additions.  Still, they complained.  There's a lesson to be
>> > learned here, IMHO: significant changes in the menu bar should only
>> > be done for a very good reason.
>> 
>> Uh, Eli?  Reality check.  The last released menu structure is from the
>> year 2001 or so.
>
> It was redesigned in 2001, but it was last released just a few weeks
> ago, with Emacs 21.4.

I just took a look at Emacs 21.4 and noticed that it indeed is quite
similar to what we have now except for a few additions (New file,
Hide/Show, Blinking Cursor, CUA mode and some others).  Somehow I was
of the opinion that the big redesign happened post-21.1.

>> No matter _what_ we will release next, it will have significant
>> changes all over the board.
>
> Not in the menu-bar's menu structure, AFAIK.
>
>> Consistency and cleanliness _are_ good reasons.
>
> Apparently, not good enough for quite a few users.  That was what I
> was trying to tell above, obviously with no success.

Well, since Hide/Show is an addition since the last release, renaming
it to "Appearance" would not be a compatibility consideration.  And
moving blink-cursor-mode inside of it would make the menu _more_
similar to what we had previously.

>> the current structure _is_ already completely dissimilar to the
>> last released one.
>
> Unless I miss a lot of changes, I don't see how the current CVS is
> ``completely dissimilar'' to v21.4 as far as the menu bar is
> concerned.  The changes are quite small.

You are correct.  Sorry for being confused about that.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-19 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-18  8:54 Options menu Kim F. Storm
2005-03-18 10:31 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-18 12:57   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-18 14:58   ` Chong Yidong
2005-03-18 22:56   ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-19 10:20     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 11:24       ` David Kastrup
2005-03-19 15:32         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 15:55           ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-03-19 15:51       ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-19 16:51         ` David Kastrup
2005-03-19 17:22         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 18:18           ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-20 12:59         ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-20 16:26           ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 16:58             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-20 17:31               ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 17:43                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-20 18:06                   ` David Kastrup
2005-03-21  1:19                   ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-21  1:19                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-20 19:31             ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-20 20:49               ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 20:45             ` Jason Rumney
2005-03-20 21:40               ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 22:27               ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-20 23:10                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21  0:02                   ` David Kastrup
2005-03-21  1:26                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-22  3:34                       ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-21  1:41                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21  6:12                     ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-21 23:28                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21 23:35                         ` David Kastrup
2005-03-21 23:50                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-22  0:15                             ` David Kastrup
2005-03-22  6:20                               ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-22 20:44                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-22 22:37                             ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 22:12             ` Miles Bader
2005-03-18 15:48 ` Drew Adams
2005-03-18 20:30   ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-18 20:53     ` Drew Adams
2005-03-19 10:13       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19  3:08 ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=x5oedfaavy.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
    --to=dak@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).