From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Options menu
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 16:55:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x5oedfaavy.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01c52c99$Blat.v2.4$0c75eac0@zahav.net.il> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:32:47 +0200")
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>> Cc: "Lennart Borgman" <lennart.borgman.073@student.lu.se>,
>> emacs-devel@gnu.org
>> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
>> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:24:34 +0100
>>
>> > When Emacs 21.1 was released, many users complained about the
>> > changed menu-bar structure, even though the new structure was
>> > generally better, certainly more standard-compliant, and had many
>> > useful additions. Still, they complained. There's a lesson to be
>> > learned here, IMHO: significant changes in the menu bar should only
>> > be done for a very good reason.
>>
>> Uh, Eli? Reality check. The last released menu structure is from the
>> year 2001 or so.
>
> It was redesigned in 2001, but it was last released just a few weeks
> ago, with Emacs 21.4.
I just took a look at Emacs 21.4 and noticed that it indeed is quite
similar to what we have now except for a few additions (New file,
Hide/Show, Blinking Cursor, CUA mode and some others). Somehow I was
of the opinion that the big redesign happened post-21.1.
>> No matter _what_ we will release next, it will have significant
>> changes all over the board.
>
> Not in the menu-bar's menu structure, AFAIK.
>
>> Consistency and cleanliness _are_ good reasons.
>
> Apparently, not good enough for quite a few users. That was what I
> was trying to tell above, obviously with no success.
Well, since Hide/Show is an addition since the last release, renaming
it to "Appearance" would not be a compatibility consideration. And
moving blink-cursor-mode inside of it would make the menu _more_
similar to what we had previously.
>> the current structure _is_ already completely dissimilar to the
>> last released one.
>
> Unless I miss a lot of changes, I don't see how the current CVS is
> ``completely dissimilar'' to v21.4 as far as the menu bar is
> concerned. The changes are quite small.
You are correct. Sorry for being confused about that.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-19 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-18 8:54 Options menu Kim F. Storm
2005-03-18 10:31 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-18 12:57 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-03-18 14:58 ` Chong Yidong
2005-03-18 22:56 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-19 10:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 11:24 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-19 15:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 15:55 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2005-03-19 15:51 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-19 16:51 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-19 17:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 18:18 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-20 12:59 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-20 16:26 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 16:58 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-20 17:31 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 17:43 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-20 18:06 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-21 1:19 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-21 1:19 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-20 19:31 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-20 20:49 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 20:45 ` Jason Rumney
2005-03-20 21:40 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 22:27 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-20 23:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21 0:02 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-21 1:26 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-22 3:34 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-21 1:41 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21 6:12 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-21 23:28 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-21 23:35 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-21 23:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-03-22 0:15 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-22 6:20 ` Lennart Borgman
2005-03-22 20:44 ` Richard Stallman
2005-03-22 22:37 ` David Kastrup
2005-03-20 22:12 ` Miles Bader
2005-03-18 15:48 ` Drew Adams
2005-03-18 20:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-18 20:53 ` Drew Adams
2005-03-19 10:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-03-19 3:08 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x5oedfaavy.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).