From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: process output has become a bit random... Date: 29 Jul 2004 12:45:35 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1091097980 31569 80.91.224.253 (29 Jul 2004 10:46:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 10:46:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 29 12:46:11 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bq8QM-0008F6-00 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:46:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bq8TX-00076z-TV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:49:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bq8TO-00076N-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:49:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Bq8TN-00075t-7w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:49:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bq8TN-00075q-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:49:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bq8Pp-0000XH-E2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:45:37 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bq8Po-00031C-GS; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 06:45:37 -0400 Original-To: Peter Heslin In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26088 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26088 Peter Heslin writes: > > storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > > I made a change on 2004-06-07 which increased the read buffer from > > 1k to 4k. I don't see how that could provoke duplicate buffer > > output, though. > > Before you made that change, my auctex latex compiles had gotten > really slow. Not pathological like the grep bug, but noticeably > slower than they should have been -- Emacs was using too much CPU. I > thought your change fixed things, but maybe there was still an > underlying bug. > > > Anybody else using that version ?? > > No. gcc 2.95.4 here. Well, I also had a few times here recently where the output trickled in one character at a time, with maybe 3 or 4 characters per second, for maybe half a minute before things caught up again. But since I also have the replication problem, and all of this is pretty much nondeterministic, I was not able to nail this down. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum