From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Key binding M-g should really be goto-line Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:50:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87u0npkjgx.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1110103483 13111 80.91.229.2 (6 Mar 2005 10:04:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 06 11:04:42 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7scl-0007Mf-Sx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:04:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7sun-0007Oh-K4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:23:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D7ssB-0007JM-5K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:20:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D7ss8-0007IV-LJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:20:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D7ss4-00078Z-Qy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:20:25 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7sPO-0007Qo-V8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:50:47 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D7sPO-0007kX-GS; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 04:50:46 -0500 Original-To: snogglethorpe@gmail.com In-Reply-To: (Miles Bader's message of "Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:16:14 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:34241 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:34241 Miles Bader writes: > On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:22:28 +0100, Johan Bockg=E5rd > wrote: >> > I really wish it weren't M-o but M-g instead. >>=20 >> Maybe i misunderstood, but it looked to me like RMS did agree to use >> M-g: >>=20 >> Jari> Is there no hope to see the 'facemenu-keymap moved to >> Jari> another key and have the goto-line solely for M-g? >>=20 >> RMS> What other key do you suggest? M-o would be ok, if people >> RMS> want. > > You may be right; I don't really care which one it is, the point I was > trying to make is the same. > > [Though using M-g would have the advantage of greatly reducing the > amount of whining on this list...] That would be reason alone. So since the rationale of "M-g" was IIRC "it's available" and since Richard seems to have agreed to using "M-o" for facemenu-keymap, let us just wait for him to reconfirm and end the whining about this matter once and for all, starting now. Hopefully. --=20 David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum