From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Tramp with global-auto-revert-mode.
Date: 15 May 2004 20:18:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x565axtuze.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86ekpl61qm.fsf@slowfox.dyndns.org>
Kai Grossjohann <kai.grossjohann@gmx.net> writes:
> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Kai Grossjohann <kai.grossjohann@gmx.net> writes:
> >
> >> David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > Uh, much too complicated.
> >>
> >> I'm afraid I don't understand you: Do you mean that just the last
> >> step is too complicated, or that the whole procedure that I described
> >> is too complicated?
> >
> > The whole procedure.
>
> Okay. I agree. Though our ideas of simplicity are different -- I
> was thinking of using multiple connection buffers.
Those have to be set up and initialized. You know that Tramp
initialization takes a _lot_ of time. If we have some timer-related
events, it is likely that we will get an indefinite stack of sessions
all occupied with initializing a connection.
> > Look, you are talking all the time about "Tramp" as if it was a
> > sentient being. It isn't.
>
> It must be! It even changed names multiple times, this tells us it
> knows what it likes.
Pffft. With that sort of reasoning, XEmacs aka Lucid Emacs aka
Emacs19-to-be-well-at-some-time-we-thought-so would be three times as
intelligent as Emacs. Don't bother commenting on that: it's no fun
starting a flame war if we are all supposed to be on the same side.
> > "Tramp" consists of two entirely different pieces: the user level
> > routines (of which several can be running at once in different
> > "threads" or Emacs' equivalence to it) and the filter routine.
> > Those are basically independent from each other.
>
> What is a filter routine? If you are talking about process filters,
> in the sense of set-process-filter, then there are no filter
> routines in Tramp.
Oh, I see. Well, it doesn't matter, strictly speaking. Whoever calls
accept-process-output should feel qualified, when being woken up, to
do the work of the non-existent process-filter, and if after that its
own task has not been finished (or even started), call
accept-process-output again.
> Are you suggesting to change Tramp such that there is a filter
> routine?
Whether you call the routine by an actual process-filter, or some task
having called accept-process-filter does it, does not make _much_ of a
difference. However, a separate process filter can be called at
slightly more times than an accept-process-filter task can be woken
up, (because the process filter starts without a personal stack frame,
and thus need not be "on top" of the stack), so the process filter
approach would probably provide a lower latency.
> > Ok, here is what the filter routine does when it is called: it
> > collects the stuff from the output until it has a completely reply to
> > the currently sent command available. If it has, it takes the
> > request and marks it as completed (tacking the results to the
> > request).
> >
> > [Entry point for getting a command on the way:]
> > It then takes a look whether there are still outstanding commands in
> > the queue. If there are, it takes the next one from the queue and
> > sends it through, marking it as being in progress.
> >
> > That's all. The filter routine never changes, it does just that.
> > There is only one filter routine at work at most at any time.
> >
> > Now for the user level stuff: it knows it needs to get commands
> > through. So it makes a request data structure and tacks it to the end
> > of the current queue (or, if the command is particularly urgent, like
> > when we are doing autorevert checking, to the _front_ of the current
> > queue) and then calls accept-process-output on the process repeatedly
> > until the command finally is marked as being processed. Then it
> > takes the results and returns.
Of course, if the shell is idle at the time that a command has been
entered into the queue, the user level routine should manually call
the above "Entry point for getting..." before relapsing into
accept-process-output, or nothing will get done, ever.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-15 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-12 22:54 Tramp with global-auto-revert-mode Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-12 23:26 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-13 23:11 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-13 23:24 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-13 23:46 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 0:08 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 1:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 1:32 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 2:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 2:53 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 3:08 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 4:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 4:45 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 5:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 19:13 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 21:02 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-14 5:01 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 23:00 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-15 0:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 1:39 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 18:34 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-15 20:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 23:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-16 0:41 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-16 13:52 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-05-17 11:04 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-17 14:20 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-16 5:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-16 18:11 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-16 18:32 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-16 20:04 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-16 22:41 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-17 5:21 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-17 12:45 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-17 15:03 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-17 15:22 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-18 16:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-18 17:10 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-21 23:44 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-22 1:08 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-22 11:52 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-23 17:21 ` Michael Albinus
2004-05-17 6:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-15 2:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 13:19 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-05-15 13:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 16:45 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-05-15 17:49 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 13:51 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 18:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-15 3:23 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-15 18:02 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 21:02 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-14 2:31 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 5:32 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 11:36 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-14 12:06 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-14 17:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 17:54 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-14 18:30 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 19:08 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 19:26 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-14 20:33 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 21:00 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-14 21:19 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 21:33 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-14 22:55 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 23:04 ` Stefan Monnier
2004-05-15 18:33 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-14 22:11 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-14 22:57 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 22:47 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 23:14 ` Kim F. Storm
2004-05-14 23:38 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 22:50 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 23:00 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 20:40 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-14 23:26 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-15 16:19 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-15 17:01 ` David Kastrup
2004-05-15 17:26 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-15 18:18 ` David Kastrup [this message]
2004-05-16 14:11 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-15 18:33 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-16 14:13 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-17 1:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-17 22:58 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-18 3:44 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 20:32 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-14 21:35 ` Michael Albinus
2004-05-15 16:22 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-14 20:29 ` Kai Grossjohann
2004-05-14 21:02 ` Richard Stallman
2004-05-14 0:54 ` Luc Teirlinck
2004-05-14 2:13 ` Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=x565axtuze.fsf@lola.goethe.zz \
--to=dak@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).