From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Possible bug in xfns.c Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:01:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <6caafaac432f7e0ccd0d7659af49040d@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109434410 9528 80.91.229.2 (26 Feb 2005 16:13:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 17:13:30 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D54ZA-0001oN-PE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 17:13:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D54r9-000688-Oo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:31:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D54n5-00022d-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D54n3-00021w-RM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:27:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D54jw-0000vd-1R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:24:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D54O2-000884-4e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:01:46 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lola.goethe.zz) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D54O1-0005tn-M7; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:01:45 -0500 Original-To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: <6caafaac432f7e0ccd0d7659af49040d@swipnet.se> (Jan D.'s message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:37:12 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33842 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33842 "Jan D." writes: > 2005-02-26 kl. 15.47 skrev David Kastrup: > >> >> Throwing a signal restores interrupt_input_blocked to the state of >> the recording of the stack frame. > > How does it do that? I can't find that in the code. Neither can I. I said that I don't have a clue about the code involved. The main suspect in that area would be callers of unwind_to_catch. Seems I am mistaken about what record_unwind_protect does. Sorry for the confusion. I am just trying to find out what makes my Emacs crash. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum