From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Branching Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:53 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87iqisp0ip.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87y6royu46.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1245548050 6430 80.91.229.12 (21 Jun 2009 01:34:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Chong Yidong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 21 03:34:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MIBwc-0006C8-7q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 03:34:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38796 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MIBwb-0003ex-DC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MIBwV-0003aG-6T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MIBwQ-0003PI-7I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51150 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MIBwQ-0003Oz-13 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:38981) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MIBwP-0006Gv-QA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1MIBwP-000113-FX; Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:53 -0400 X-Spook: Audiotel 64 Vauxhall Cross ammunition bluebird doctrine X-Ran: 7E[]\pmMT;5?W10S}zf5uuGgV$[Hyh#Q4['?v`X:Kz_;{d@"cPNg%cpk (Chong Yidong's message of "Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:08:09 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111607 Archived-At: Chong Yidong wrote: >> Has anyone given thought to the branch tag? If we follow previous >> conventions, we'd name the branch EMACS_23_BASE, but this is somewhat >> misleading. That was a mistake, not a convention. :) > I think what we want is to tag the current HEAD as EMACS_23_BASE, and > create the EMACS_23_1_RC branch from that tag. Correct? EMACS_23_1_BASE and EMACS_23_1_RC would be consistent with 21. admin/make-tarball.txt says: cvs rtag EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE cvs rtag -b EMACS_`NUMBER'_RC -r EMACS_`NUMBER'_BASE If this is wrong, it should be corrected.