From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Mac port Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:07:31 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471910876 10222 195.159.176.226 (23 Aug 2016 00:07:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:07:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Marius Kjeldahl Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 23 02:07:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bbzFu-0002RU-Kc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:07:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43690 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbzFs-0007En-3C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:07:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbzFl-0007Ei-Kp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:07:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbzFi-0000Cn-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:07:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:53246) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bbzFh-0000BH-Ql for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:07:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fermat1.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (fermat [192.168.32.10]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA09F08E1; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:07:31 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 133.82.132.2 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:206760 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:41:45 +0000, Marius Kjeldahl said: > Following up on my own post, I now noticed that there was a setting > in my .emacs file that selected the bold weighting. Why "stock" > Emacs did not respect that setting and this "Mac port" did I have no > idea. Changed the default weight to normal and now both versions > have identical fonts. A curious mind might want to know why the > "stock" Emacs OSX build does not respect the bold weight. The > specific setting from my .emacs is: Probably this is due to the following workaround only in the Mac port: * emacs-24.4-mac-5.3 (2015-01-29) http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-01/msg01040.html ** Fixed bugs *** Synthetic bold text looks thinner on Retina display/HiDPI mode. This is because stroke line width for text drawing is not correctly scaled (whereas it is correctly scaled when drawn to bitmaps) on such environments. I've been reporting this to Apple on every OS X update since it was 10.7.4, but I couldn't get any response until recently. At last Apple answers that there are no plans to address this issue (rdar://11644870) currently. So I added a workaround that would cause a bad reverse effect if the original issue were fixed. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp