From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Use Core Text for Cocoa Emacs Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 09:45:34 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <94E6FF46-4227-4DA2-BE35-C64908558378@gmail.com> <18325.1274214480@ccs.covici.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274229954 22852 80.91.229.12 (19 May 2010 00:45:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 00:45:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: covici@ccs.covici.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 19 02:45:52 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEXPv-0000qB-Vn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 May 2010 02:45:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46026 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEXPv-0005f4-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 20:45:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44115 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OEXPp-0005cb-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 20:45:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEXPo-0007tt-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 20:45:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:61331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OEXPn-0007th-Rk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 May 2010 20:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCE4C0560; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:45:34 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <18325.1274214480@ccs.covici.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:124918 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 18 May 2010 16:28:00 -0400, covici@ccs.covici.com said: > What about accessibility -- which of these would work better with > Voiceover? Could you explain more concretely about what use case is in your mind when you talk about "accessibility" or "Voiceover"? YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp