From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Frame ordering Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:42:55 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <8F18E079-3351-4398-B76B-6CF9169ACE9E@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276321394 21254 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2010 05:43:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2010 05:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel devel To: David Reitter Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 12 07:43:10 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONJUq-0007p2-CS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 07:43:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONJUp-00019t-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:43:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52302 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ONJUi-00018i-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:43:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONJUg-0002jX-Oa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:43:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:53260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ONJUg-0002j5-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 01:42:58 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D03C0557; Sat, 12 Jun 2010 14:42:55 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <8F18E079-3351-4398-B76B-6CF9169ACE9E@gmail.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125782 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:29:23 -0400, David Reitter said: > Currently, frames seem to be selected in order of their creation; > deleting a frame does not select the previously created frame, but > the frame that was created before it. Many users (e.g., see below) > find this annoying, and so do I. If you mean the behavior that C-x 5 2, C-x 5 2, C-x 5 o, C-x 5 0 selects the oldest frame rather than the youngest one, that is specific to the NS port. The behavior might depend on the window manager as for X11, but at least X11 builds with the default X11 window manager (quartz-wm) on Mac OS X, as well as the Mac port, select the youngest frame. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp