From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>,
ralphm@members.fsf.org, mathias.dahl@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Building Emacs overflowed pure space
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:22:44 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <wlslkykkyj.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1G35B0-00064L-CJ@fencepost.gnu.org>
>>>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 02:04:54 -0400, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> said:
> I don't quite follow. Why does the redefinition made by cl.el alter
> the size of the expansion of these macro calls?
The major difference seems to come from the length of the uninterned
symbol name that is allocated for each expanded `dolist'.
static POINTER_TYPE *
pure_alloc (size, type)
size_t size;
int type;
{
POINTER_TYPE *result;
#ifdef USE_LSB_TAG
size_t alignment = (1 << GCTYPEBITS);
#else
size_t alignment = sizeof (EMACS_INT);
The length of the name of '--dolist-temp-- (in subr.el) is 15, and it
takes 2 units in 8(== (1 << GCTYPEBITS))-byte block including the
terminating nul char. On the other hand, the name of
'--cl-dolist-temp-- takes 3 units.
Here's the result of some experiments:
Dumped with dolist in subr.el: 1209808 bytes used
dolist in cl.el: >1211000 bytes used (overflow)
dolist in cl.el with the modification
'--cl-dolist-temp-- -> '--dolist-temp-- :
1209832 bytes used
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-19 9:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-18 8:38 Building Emacs overflowed pure space Mathias Dahl
2006-07-18 9:02 ` Ralph Moritz
2006-07-18 12:06 ` Mathias Dahl
2006-07-18 13:37 ` David Hansen
2006-07-18 15:00 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-18 18:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-07-18 20:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-07-18 20:56 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-19 2:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-07-19 4:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-19 4:42 ` Miles Bader
2006-07-19 18:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-07-19 13:52 ` mituharu
2006-07-19 15:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-19 21:16 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-20 1:12 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-07-22 9:06 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-07-22 16:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-22 23:11 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-23 3:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-25 1:14 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-07-25 4:13 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-25 10:41 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-07-25 10:56 ` David Kastrup
2006-07-25 11:00 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-07-25 11:05 ` David Kastrup
[not found] ` <85ejwahrqi.fsf@lola.goethe.zz>
2006-07-25 11:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-07-25 11:23 ` David Kastrup
2006-07-23 5:26 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-18 22:01 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-07-18 23:44 ` Chong Yidong
2006-07-19 0:06 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-07-19 0:14 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-07-19 0:21 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-07-19 2:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2006-07-18 19:29 ` Luc Teirlinck
2006-07-19 6:04 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-19 9:22 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu [this message]
2006-07-19 9:46 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-07-19 15:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-19 23:13 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-20 4:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-20 2:13 ` YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
2006-07-20 2:21 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-20 2:21 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-20 4:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-20 8:14 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-20 15:26 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-20 18:16 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-19 21:15 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-19 22:47 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-20 15:33 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-20 9:34 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-20 9:58 ` David Kastrup
2006-07-20 11:35 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-20 13:46 ` David Kastrup
2006-07-20 18:16 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-21 8:36 ` Kim F. Storm
2006-07-21 19:36 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-21 19:48 ` David Kastrup
2006-07-21 20:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-07-21 20:49 ` David Kastrup
2006-07-22 15:49 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-20 16:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-20 21:46 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-20 22:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-21 4:46 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-21 12:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2006-07-21 19:37 ` Richard Stallman
2006-07-19 0:44 ` Katsumi Yamaoka
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-08-07 13:30 Klaus Zeitler
2006-08-08 9:20 ` Klaus Zeitler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=wlslkykkyj.wl%mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp \
--to=mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mathias.dahl@gmail.com \
--cc=ralphm@members.fsf.org \
--cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).