From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Carbon port and multi-tty Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 12:18:38 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <87r6cf1if3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1210130340 12899 80.91.229.12 (7 May 2008 03:19:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 03:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 07 05:19:34 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JtaBq-0005QR-5K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 May 2008 05:19:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JtaB4-0005VE-VP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 23:18:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JtaB1-0005V9-H6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 23:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JtaAy-0005Ux-3d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 23:18:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55453 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JtaAx-0005Uu-Tq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 23:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JtaAx-00089U-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 May 2008 23:18:39 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866922C40; Wed, 7 May 2008 12:18:38 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:96644 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 06 May 2008 23:13:37 -0400, Stefan Monnier said: >>>> I would be too if it didn't contain the changes that are >>>> unrelated to multi-tty. >>> This is simply not true. Maybe some of the changes appear >>> unrelated because you know they should be done differently, but >>> I'm pretty sure Dan's changes had no other intention than "do the >>> bare minimum to get it to compile&start". >> I suspect so too. I mean, he did the job that is similar to >> "forward-line" -> "next-line". > With one major difference: his patch did not make anything worse. It actually introduced a bug in the part that is unrelated to multi-tty. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp