From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest next week Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:10:15 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <87y6x4ue2u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233101461 1466 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2009 00:11:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 28 01:12:14 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRy2D-00005L-2n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:12:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRy0u-0006yw-U8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:10:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRy0q-0006yc-NH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:10:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRy0o-0006y4-6x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:10:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45920 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRy0o-0006y0-0K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:10:34 -0500 Original-Received: from ntp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:51057 helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRy0h-0005w2-39; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:10:28 -0500 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B492C5B; Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:10:21 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108313 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 05:28:15 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> > What is "improper" in how C-g is handled on Cocoa? >> >> It makes almost all uses of QUIT macro throughout the source code >> meaningless. > Could you please supply a few more technical details, assuming that > I know something about how C-g is supposed to work in Emacs? What > doesn't work on Cocoa that works on GNU/Linux and other platforms? If a Lisp expression doesn't contain any direct or indirect call to some read operation, its evaluation cannot be quit in the Cocoa/GNUstep port. Simple examples are (while t) and (shell-command "sleep 100"). YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp