From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:16:25 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1097731020 25061 80.91.229.6 (14 Oct 2004 05:17:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 05:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 14 07:16:45 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CHxym-0007rN-00 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 07:16:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHy5r-0004V4-Hb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:24:03 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHy5k-0004Uo-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:23:56 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CHy5j-0004UR-MV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:23:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CHy5j-0004UO-I7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:23:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [133.82.132.2] (helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CHxyY-0000y3-6q; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 01:16:30 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4291A63AC; Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:16:26 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28376 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28376 >>>>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:43:24 -0400, Richard Stallman said: > If BLOCK_INPUT continues for a long time, which is typical in > Mac OS X/Carbon, > That sounds like a bug to me. BLOCK_INPUT should only be set for > short periods of time. That's not unusual even in X11. For example, BLOCK_INPUT occurs when a popup menu is activated. Then the menu takes control of the user input, and BLOCK_INPUT continues until the user complete the menu operation. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp