From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: CVS HEAD fails to build on OSX 10.4 (macterm.c broken?) Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2007 16:02:23 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <86k5re4blv.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291531.l7TFVnlD010335@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86fy224aah.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86bqcq4a4q.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291604.l7TG4atk011108@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <867ine492x.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <863ay24826.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <200708291641.l7TGfo2t012413@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200708310812.l7V8Cgq9022040@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <86lkbnygii.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <46DC1EF6.1040002@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189148574 14373 80.91.229.12 (7 Sep 2007 07:02:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 07:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: yavor@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 07 09:02:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ITXrc-0000oc-PW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 09:02:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXra-0007C9-Tb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:02:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXrW-00077c-7s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:02:42 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXrU-00074G-LE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:02:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ITXrU-000741-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:02:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITXrL-0005B5-Or; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:02:31 -0400 Original-Received: from ntp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2] helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1ITXrI-0002Bq-6g; Fri, 07 Sep 2007 03:02:28 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C282C46; Fri, 7 Sep 2007 16:02:23 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/23.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78098 Archived-At: >>>>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:30:40 -0400, Richard Stallman said: > The Carbon+AppKit port is not strictly a new port, but can be seen as > a variant of the Carbon port. That's one of the reasons I put such a > name. The Carbon+AppKit port provides the same feature sets and > shares most of the code with the existing Carbon port. > If we install this, would we do so by changing the existing Carbon > port? The changes to the existing Carbon port is basically reorganization. Some functions/variables are moved to a new file mactoolbox.c. Either Carbon or Carbon+Appkit port can be built with the modified source. >>>>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:30:40 -0400, Richard Stallman said: > That might be something we could put into a 22.3 or 22.4 release if > Emacs 23 is not going to be as soon as we hope. It depends on how > simple and safe the changes are. >>>>> On Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:31:47 -0400, Richard Stallman said: > Also, as I said, the Carbon+AppKit port is > primarily a variant of the Carbon port, and therefore I think it can > be included to the later versions of Emacs 22. > I do not want to add such features to Emacs 22. > Please aim at Emacs 23. I'm confused by these contradicting reactions. Anyway, I'm not in a hurry at all as I said. We can't get 64-bit UI support until the next Mac OS X release planed in October. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp