From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: alarm_signal_handler is called too frequently Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:36:26 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098005821 25961 80.91.229.6 (17 Oct 2004 09:37:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 09:37:01 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 17 11:36:51 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CJ7T8-0006UO-00 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 11:36:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ7aN-0006hk-Hv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 05:44:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ7aF-0006hd-Fn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 05:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ7aF-0006hR-2n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 05:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CJ7aE-0006hO-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 05:44:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [133.82.132.2] (helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CJ7Sl-0007x2-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 05:36:28 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D97F1A6397 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:36:26 +0900 (JST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28502 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28502 >>>>> On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:16:25 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu said: > For example, BLOCK_INPUT occurs when a popup menu is activated. > Then the menu takes control of the user input, and BLOCK_INPUT > continues until the user complete the menu operation. The frequent call of alarm_signal_handler was observed also on GNU/Linux (with or without GTK) during a popup menu was shown. Could someone answer the original question below? >>>>> On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:15:53 +0900, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu said: > I think we don't have to call set_alarm when pending_atimers is > non-zero because do_pending_atimers is supposed to be called > eventually in such a case. Is that correct? YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp