From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Stephen.Berman@gmx.net: Re: redisplay] Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 09:23:12 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <87mz0z5dux.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <462D059B.7020001@swipnet.se> <87d51u211n.fsf@escher.local.home> <20070424.075017.71197070.mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp> <87lkgergy1.fsf@escher.local.home> <85odl7hb3x.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85647ebzgr.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177979013 28026 80.91.229.12 (1 May 2007 00:23:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 00:23:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 01 02:23:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hig9Q-0005wv-7Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 02:23:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HigFe-0003Ir-Nq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HigFa-0003Ic-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HigFX-0003IQ-Tm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:29:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HigFX-0003IN-Qm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:29:47 -0400 Original-Received: from ntp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2] helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hig9F-0008C5-PE; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:23:18 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69F82C40; Tue, 1 May 2007 09:23:12 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <85647ebzgr.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.99 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-kernel: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70435 Archived-At: >>>>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:14:12 +0200, David Kastrup said: > Every change, including bug fixes, in particular in general areas, > carries with it the danger of introducing _exactly_ those kind of > heavy regressions. The ChangeLog files are _full_ of reverted fixes > which turned out to do something wrong. If you wanted to say so, you shouldn't have brought it up against my patch. Its validity was too obvious to apply your principle above. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp