From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: overflow pure space Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 20:01:25 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <87wtas6otw.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87sllfj3hb.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1152183741 30529 80.91.229.2 (6 Jul 2006 11:02:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2006 11:02:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 06 13:02:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyRc6-0000Su-Om for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:01:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyRc6-0004IM-Cf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:01:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyRbv-0004FY-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:01:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FyRbt-0004Cc-Ix for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:01:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FyRbt-0004CJ-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [133.82.132.2] (helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FyRc2-0005J1-6m; Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A412CB8; Thu, 6 Jul 2006 20:01:25 +0900 (JST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:56623 Archived-At: > The question is not what caused the recent addition to the pure > space, the question is why some people see overflow, while others > don't, on the same platform. Maybe I'm not completely following the related threads, but at least one can see such a difference as follows: $ make bootstrap -> 1210372 pure bytes used $ cd lisp $ make bootstrap-clean $ make compile EMACS=../src/emacs $ cd .. $ make clean $ make -> 1209036 pure bytes used (on Mac OS X 10.4.7, X11) I observed that .elc's compiled by bootstrap-emacs have `dolist' expanded by cl.el, whereas those compiled by emacs have subr.el-version. Actually, bootstrap-emacs loads cl.el via preloaded .el files that contain (eval-when-compile (require 'cl)), where `eval-when-compile' just behaves like `progn'. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp