From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: install error on Mac OS X Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 18:14:46 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <86ac3cqbna.fsf@rakim.cfhp.org> <20061101.090235.63826615.kazu@iij.ad.jp> <86fyd2knb3.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> <86wt6cnya2.fsf@blue.stonehenge.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1162804525 15480 80.91.229.2 (6 Nov 2006 09:15:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 09:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, merlyn@stonehenge.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 06 10:15:20 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0ZU-0004gB-G6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 10:15:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0ZT-0006An-TY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0ZF-00066R-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:14:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0ZA-00060u-Vl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:14:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh0ZA-00060F-Ht for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:14:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [133.82.132.2] (helo=mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gh0Z8-0004Lv-Uw; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 04:14:51 -0500 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5562D2CE8; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:14:46 +0900 (JST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.90 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:61857 Archived-At: >>>>> On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 02:07:43 -0500, Richard Stallman said: > If the usual case on the Mac is to use Carbon and not X, it seems to > me that Emacs should ALWAYS use Carbon when built in the default > way. I'm not sure which is the usual case. Users of precompiled binary packages might be dominant among the Carbon-version users. > To use X should require a specific option. What should we do for the case that --with-x-toolkit (or other X-specific options) is specified without explicit --with-x or --without-carbon? YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp