From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest next week Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:27:33 +0900 Organization: Faculty of Science, Chiba University Message-ID: References: <87y6x4ue2u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233013645 21350 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2009 23:47:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 23:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 27 00:48:39 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LRbC2-0006eq-FP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:48:38 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57578 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRbAk-0004CI-MZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:47:18 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRark-0000xc-D6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:27:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LRarj-0000wt-Nc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:27:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45663 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LRarj-0000wk-Go for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:27:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp ([133.82.132.2]:53225) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LRari-00076u-6r; Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:27:38 -0500 Original-Received: from church.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (church [133.82.132.36]) by mathmail.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEAF2C58; Tue, 27 Jan 2009 08:27:35 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.3 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: NetBSD 3.0 (DF) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:108272 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:36:31 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: >> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:46:29 +0900 From: YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu >> >> >> I'm really surprised to hear that it hasn't have the top priority. >> I've been thinking that proper C-g handling is a minimum >> requirement to be a part of the official Emacs rather than an >> unofficial distribution. > What is "improper" in how C-g is handled on Cocoa? It makes almost all uses of QUIT macro throughout the source code meaningless. YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp