From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: John Paul Wallington <jpw@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: how-many/count-matches for non-interactive use
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:53:00 +0100
Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Message-ID: <wkzn2dmctf.fsf@filth.shootybangbang.com>
References: <87pt3m5vqk.fsf@oak.pohoyda.family>
	<E1CIFvM-0006Nf-U4@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<m1r7o0b0vy.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<E1CIoyS-0002xV-7v@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87zn2mh5jk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<m3brf2b9xs.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<87is99nznd.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
	<200410172053.i9HKrdL01136@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CJY2i-0001Js-H2@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200410190158.i9J1wrH25523@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CJx7Y-0000UE-Dy@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200410200127.i9K1Rpp28384@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CKS1R-0007ot-2Y@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200410210308.i9L38Dm10997@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CKwwp-0007Ne-GE@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<200410222222.i9MMMD515903@raven.dms.auburn.edu>
	<E1CLQwr-0003wG-Kf@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098561669 4887 80.91.229.6 (23 Oct 2004 20:01:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:01:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, klm@zope.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
	monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, storm@cua.dk, alexander.pohoyda@gmx.net
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 23 22:00:56 2004
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1CLS4O-0000M7-00
	for <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 22:00:56 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CLSBw-0000wp-Sj
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:08:44 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CLSBm-0000v4-98
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:08:34 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CLSBl-0000uS-2A
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:08:33 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLSBk-0000uP-Vk
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:08:33 -0400
Original-Received: from [207.8.226.2] (helo=kelvin.pobox.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1CLS3v-0006kC-7o; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:00:27 -0400
Original-Received: from kelvin (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kelvin.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5371944CD;
	Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:00:26 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from filth.shootybangbang.com
	(host217-44-221-101.range217-44.btcentralplus.com [217.44.221.101])
	by kelvin.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F62208FDC;
	Sat, 23 Oct 2004 16:00:24 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: rms@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <E1CLQwr-0003wG-Kf@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard
	Stallman on Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:49:05 -0400)
X-Mailer: Norman
X-Attribution: jpw
X-Face: R(_z-<e!Z,qjN8xeu/^:Szs}15R'D_9}g7Qlm0x+2sF<`w9o]-oT>rF:grdKO.*u`n);
	p.i$Eiz=h^CO5eDYv"4:K@#\HN09*Ykx}}B{kF/KH}%f_o^Wp<kb`,1KLtZp"^C{-{e~S=IP0_"8B6K+CkbKw='FSzftzu
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28802
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28802

> The call to interactive-p in ibuf-ext.el is in ibuffer-kill-line.
> Since it conditions the choice of whether to use call-interactively,
> it is most surely wrong.  I think this is the right fix; would someone
> who uses ibuf-ext.el please check it?

Yup.  Installed.