From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: something really wrong with rpm -qf tab completion (24.0.95.1) Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:05:40 -0400 Message-ID: References: <6pfwcgaht9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333735553 30276 80.91.229.3 (6 Apr 2012 18:05:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 18:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Neal Becker Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 06 20:05:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SGDXh-0003jT-0U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 20:05:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50278 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGDXg-00083f-CU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:05:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGDXc-00082M-T3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:05:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGDXa-0001hR-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:05:44 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:50441) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGDXa-0001hN-9g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:05:42 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SGDXY-0007eS-NH; Fri, 06 Apr 2012 14:05:40 -0400 X-Spook: RSA quarter Yukon Becker Taiwan Sundevil CipherTAC-2000 X-Ran: oh*)po42|zO:bI`V$kbFc"r!a.:,e#zww,X/f4EJ18}Hw+$qgVN\vo'Cqb}TVjbTZjp?9$ X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <6pfwcgaht9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 06 Apr 2012 13:30:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149436 Archived-At: Also, rpm -qa --nodigest --nosignature would be much faster (0.25s for me versus 2s for rpm -qa). But then you have to jump through the hoop of testing that those options are supported. Maybe they are old enough to be taken for granted.