[don@donarmstrong.com: bug#496: Info received (bug#496: 23.0.60; ispell-word becomes increasingly slower)]

[don@donarmstrong.com: bug#496: Info received (bug#496: 23.0.60; ispell-word becomes increasingly slower)]

[Eli Zaretskii]

And why do I get 3 copies of the below?

------- Start of forwarded message -------
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham 
	version=3.1.0
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 08:15:06 -0700
From: don@donarmstrong.com (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: bug#496: Info received (bug#496: 23.0.60; ispell-word becomes 
 increasingly slower)


Thank you for the additional information you have supplied regarding
this bug report.

This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
has been received.

Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.

Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
 Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>

If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 496@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, as before.

Please do not send mail to don@donarmstrong.com unless you wish
to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.


- -- 
496: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=496
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems
------- End of forwarded message -------

Re: [don@donarmstrong.com: bug#496: Info received (bug#496: 23.0.60; ispell-word becomes increasingly slower)]

[Glenn Morris]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> And why do I get 3 copies of the below?

When you reply to a bug, you should only have two addresses present:

i) the submitter
ii) ###@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com

(basically, respect the Reply-To header.)

If you also have "bug-gnu-emacs", or "emacs-pretest-bug", multiple
copies will start flying around. "Followup" may introduce some of
these, see bug #430.

In your recent replies to bugs, you also had:

Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org,
	bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com

I don't know where these came from.


To not get tracker acknowldgements, add a header X-Debbugs-No-Ack:,
with any value, to any message you send.

To ignore most tracker control messages, discard anything matching:

^X-Emacs-PR-Message: transcript

Re: [don@donarmstrong.com: bug#496: Info received (bug#496: 23.0.60; ispell-word becomes increasingly slower)]

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
> Cc: Don Armstrong <don@donarmstrong.com>,  emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:09:58 -0400
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > And why do I get 3 copies of the below?
> 
> When you reply to a bug, you should only have two addresses present:
> 
> i) the submitter
> ii) ###@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
> 
> (basically, respect the Reply-To header.)

I use Rmail's `r' command, which AFAIK does respect Reply-To.

> In your recent replies to bugs, you also had:
> 
> Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org,
> 	bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com
> 
> I don't know where these came from.

Hey, I just hit `r' in Rmail.  If someone thinks that Rmail does
something wrong, please tell what that is, and let's fix it.  It's
silly to have an Emacs bug tracker that is incompatible with Emacs's
own MUA.

> To not get tracker acknowldgements, add a header X-Debbugs-No-Ack:,
> with any value, to any message you send.
> 
> To ignore most tracker control messages, discard anything matching:
> 
> ^X-Emacs-PR-Message: transcript

Thanks, but I'd like to see the nuisance go away without any
additional burden for me.