From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-15?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: NT Emacs make problem.. Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:29:39 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <9735-Wed05Jun2002210858+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200206070044.g570igm25650@aztec.santafe.edu> <5567-Fri07Jun2002163738+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200206081915.g58JF3228747@aztec.santafe.edu> <200206101014.g5AAEOd01405@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023823874 30002 127.0.0.1 (11 Jun 2002 19:31:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, eliz@is.elta.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17HrMI-0007nn-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 17Hrjk-0007TM-00 for ; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:55:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HrM1-0007Ij-00; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:30:57 -0400 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17HrKx-00072C-00; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:29:51 -0400 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g5BJTkb27352; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:29:46 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id VAA29460; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:29:40 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id BC3F83B2EE; Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:29:39 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "D. Goel" In-Reply-To: ("D. Goel"'s message of "11 Jun 2002 13:11:23 -0400") Original-Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.3.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:4762 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:4762 "D. Goel" writes: > Cool, we are done with this file then :). I am including the file at > the end of this mail. perhaps, Could the maintainers please install it? I still think it would be useful to say something about "make bootstrap". Suggestion A (to be appended to the previous text): Normally, it is not necessary to use "make bootstrap" after every CVS update. Unless there are problems, "make all" should be used. Suggestion B (also for append): Note that "make bootstrap" overwrites some files which are under CVS control (in particular, lisp/loaddefs.el and lisp/cus-load.el). So subsequent CVS updates might lead to CVS conflicts. If such a conflict arises, just overwrite your copy of the file with a clean copy from the CVS repository, for example by issuing the following command: cvs update -C lisp/cus-load.el It's not clear to me which of the two suggestions should go in, but at least one of them appears useful. (Maybe you want both.) Opinions? kai -- ~/.signature is: umop 3p!sdn (Frank Nobis)