From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Enhancements to options menu (was Re: Reveal mode) Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 17:55:30 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204302119.g3ULJAP06813@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xznzj30j0.fsf_-_@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205031825.g43IP3e00651@aztec.santafe.edu> <5xwuuk6b4q.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <200205052315.g45NFFE29713@rum.cs.yale.edu> <8632-Tue07May2002212418+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020873450 9711 127.0.0.1 (8 May 2002 15:57:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ttn@glug.org, karl@freefriends.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 175Too-0002WW-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 17:57:30 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 175Tx0-00084n-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 18:05:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175Tok-0005LL-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 11:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 175Tn5-0005GC-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2002 11:55:43 -0400 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g48Ftab20793; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:55:36 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id RAA19695; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:55:31 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id F33143AF2E; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:55:30 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Eli Zaretskii In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Wed, 08 May 2002 17:31:34 +0200") Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3742 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3742 Simon Josefsson writes: > Right, the manual browser would continue to work the same, but the > file format need to be changed if images and stuff are to be > supported. HTML could be made to work, I think. DocBook seems to be > designed for these things, maybe it is better, I don't know. Since images are just one tag, why not include that? Surely it can't be so difficult to frob the code such that it groks "*image /path/to/file::" in addition to "*note Some Node::". The image tag could be replaced with the image itself. And then makeinfo needs to spit out the image tag when appropriate. kai -- Silence is foo!