From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [friedman@splode.com: some other observations on pcomplete] Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:15:12 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200203102132.g2ALWfr04155@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203121812.g2CIC2E15076@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200203131058.g2DAwSX05431@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203150342.g2F3gBT06509@wijiji.santafe.edu> <200203171922.g2HJM0p08228@wijiji.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016554737 10609 127.0.0.1 (19 Mar 2002 16:18:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 16:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, johnw@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16nMK9-0002l1-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:18:57 +0100 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16nMPU-0007V8-00 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:24:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16nMJR-0007RW-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16nMGl-0007IG-00; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:15:28 -0500 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g2JGFJb22832; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:15:19 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id RAA18905; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:15:13 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id 0B59B3AE81; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:15:12 +0100 (CET) Original-To: friedman@splode.com In-Reply-To: <200203171922.g2HJM0p08228@wijiji.santafe.edu> (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun, 17 Mar 2002 12:22:00 -0700 (MST)") Original-Lines: 16 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2044 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2044 Richard Stallman writes: > How about giving John a chance to frob the variables to make the > behavior more similar to the old completion behavior? > > Everyone has a chance to do this, but I don't want it installed > until people report to me that it really is the right behavior. Noah, does the new completion in shell mode do the right thing when you (setq pcomplete-cycle-completions nil)? kai -- Silence is foo! _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel