From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-l while in menu? Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:13:49 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200204072343.g37NhIC20114@aztec.santafe.edu> <200204201727.g3KHRD401381@aztec.santafe.edu> <200204220746.g3M7kvY01878@aztec.santafe.edu> <200204220928.g3M9S9H32293@rum.cs.yale.edu> <3CC40A74.5040600@666.com> <3CC525C5.70400@666.com> <200204250606.g3P66RF03821@aztec.santafe.edu> <87znzsciej.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019726126 1221 127.0.0.1 (25 Apr 2002 09:15:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 09:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, miles@gnu.org, ben@666.com, Pavel@Janik.cz, monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu, gerd@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 170fLZ-0000Ja-00 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:15:25 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 170fNe-0004mn-00 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:17:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170fLT-00037q-00; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 05:15:19 -0400 Original-Received: from waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de ([129.217.4.42]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 170fKF-00033o-00; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 05:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lothlorien [129.217.19.67]) by waldorf.cs.uni-dortmund.de with ESMTP id g3P9Dtb19610; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:13:55 +0200 (MES) Original-Received: from lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (lucy [129.217.19.80]) by lothlorien.cs.uni-dortmund.de id LAA00439; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:13:49 +0200 (MET DST) Original-Received: by lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de (Postfix, from userid 6104) id 589ED3AE7E; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 11:13:49 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" In-Reply-To: <87znzsciej.fsf@tleepslib.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> ("Stephen J. Turnbull"'s message of "25 Apr 2002 17:05:40 +0900") Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2.50 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3241 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3241 "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > But it _does_ override the M-f command for users who set > `modifier-keys-are-sticky' The behavior I described (M-f does forward-word, but f invokes the file menu) should be available as one option amongst several. It should not be the only option. Do you agree? I'm not sure what should be the default behavior. This can be discussed, of course. kai -- Silence is foo!