From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Reiner Steib <4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de> Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: nndb.el requires tcp Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:38:36 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <01c49720$Blat.v2.2.2$b48fff20@zahav.net.il> <01c49729$Blat.v2.2.2$ea11b9a0@zahav.net.il> Reply-To: Reiner Steib NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094820014 8010 80.91.224.253 (10 Sep 2004 12:40:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Miles Bader , eliz@gnu.org, jas@extundo.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 10 14:40:07 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C5khD-0006yo-00 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:40:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5kma-0007u3-P0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:45:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5klx-0007c8-Cx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:45:01 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C5klv-0007bI-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:45:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C5klu-0007au-Tv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:44:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [134.60.1.1] (helo=mail-new.rz.uni-ulm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1C5kfs-0005zV-M6; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 08:38:45 -0400 Original-Received: from lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de [134.60.10.173]) by mail.uni-ulm.de (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8ACcbnq011760; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:38:39 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: by lumberjack.physik.uni-ulm.de (Postfix, from userid 170) id 0681D18177; Fri, 10 Sep 2004 14:38:37 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Emacs development X-Face: /U7=m^"/-Dn61mAl{g9e3>\G5Tp,oEX|V)g2I1hBk\ML; )7A?6cmB-y7y?'NA^J<=oz7syB =(McAwIHgLX!.B?R3X}98d@?>CrT094KLWh]WU4gDpnL/")MS(XoQTv`Oq225uL>+; CpPXo$N5e>N> $tPd-gbB^F{gQS#1ase]XO~D4p4M"3+F-7~u]dy3I?Pb8RO*H-EFeWDUf?Rf, d]pv\Jvh2Cht!A=im yKAS2Z%Ao^;}W/qzMvMm In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:49:33 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-RollaNet-Metrics: gemini 1040; Body=4 Fuz1=4 Fuz2=4 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26964 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26964 On Fri, Sep 10 2004, Simon Josefsson wrote: > "Eli Zaretskii" writes: [...] >> Should I remove the entire eval-and-compile expression in the Emacs >> CVS? > > I think that would be the right thing. I've done the same on the Gnus > V5-10 branch as well, now. You could remove the duplicate (require > 'cl) below the expression too. Maybe it be better to install it only in Emacs CVS _or_ in v5-10 (Gnus stable branch) and let it propagate to the other by Miles' arch synching? We should do whatever is more convenient for Miles, I think. Bye, Reiner. -- ,,, (o o) ---ooO-(_)-Ooo--- | PGP key available | http://rsteib.home.pages.de/